Alternatives to Adobe XD (2026): UI/UX Tools with Collaboration Features

Figma is often selected when teams want co-editing as a default behavior and a single place to manage files, libraries, and review links. In practice, this can map well to XD-style flows where design, prototype, and handoff sit close together.

• Typical strength: collaboration-first editing, review links, and library-driven systems.
• Planning detail that matters: Figma’s pricing is structured around seat types (for example, collaboration, development, and full access).

Published pricing example (USD): Starter is listed as Free, and a Professional plan example lists a Full seat at $16/mo (with other seat types priced separately). [Source-2✅]

Sketch is widely used in workflows that are macOS-centered and value a native desktop experience paired with browser-based viewing and handoff. It can align well with XD-like expectations when you want design and prototyping in a focused environment.

• Platform profile: native Mac app emphasis, with web features used for sharing, viewing, and handoff.
• Plan structure: subscriptions for collaboration plus a one-time Mac-only license option.

Published pricing example (USD): Standard is shown as $12 per editor/month (billed yearly), Enterprise as $44 per editor/month (billed yearly), and a Mac-only license is listed at $120 per seat (includes one year of updates). [Source-3✅]

Penpot is positioned as a web-based open-source design tool that emphasizes design-to-development collaboration. It is commonly considered when data ownership and deployment flexibility are part of the decision, without leaving behind core UI design and prototyping needs.

• Practical differentiator: open-source positioning and a workflow narrative that stays close to implementation realities.
• Decision point: whether you need cloud SaaS, a controlled environment, or both.

Published pricing example: a Professional tier is shown as $0 per user/month, an Unlimited tier as $7 per user/month, and Enterprise as $950 per month, with storage quotas listed per tier. [Source-4✅]

For teams that want more control over deployment, Penpot also publishes a self-hosting guide aimed at running an instance on infrastructure you control. [Source-5✅]

Axure RP is commonly chosen when prototypes need structured logic (states, conditions, variables) and when teams want specifications and annotations to travel with the design work. This makes it a frequent candidate in enterprise or documentation-heavy environments.

• Best-fit scenario: complex interaction models and stakeholder-ready documentation.
• Migration angle: if XD prototypes were used for more than transitions, Axure can cover deeper behavior modeling.

Published pricing example (USD): Axure RP Pro is listed at $29 per user/month (billed annually) or $39 (billed monthly), with a Team tier listed at $49 (annual) or $59 (monthly). [Source-6✅]

UXPin is often evaluated by teams that want to keep prototyping and handoff aligned with product workflows, especially where permissions, collaboration, and structured review are important. It is commonly compared to XD when teams want a controlled, web-based design system process.

• Where it tends to fit: product teams that value structured flows and stakeholder visibility.
• What to verify early: plan differences, because UXPin’s published pricing includes tiering and periodic promotions.

Published pricing example (USD): UXPin lists Starter at $6/month billed yearly (with a “first 3 months free” note), Professional at $10/month billed yearly, and Company at $29/month billed yearly (with an “afterward $35/month” note). [Source-7✅]

Balsamiq is a frequent companion to XD-style workflows when teams want to separate structure from high-fidelity polish. Low-fidelity wireframes reduce time spent debating visuals too early, while still producing shareable artifacts for review.

• Common use: early-stage flows, IA discussions, and alignment before UI components are finalized.
• Licensing flexibility: cloud subscriptions and desktop licenses are both part of the model.

Published numbers: Balsamiq’s cloud plans are shown as starting at $12/month (or $120/year), and the pricing page also states the product has been bought over 1.4 million times. [Source-8✅]

ProtoPie is typically evaluated when “prototype” means more than transitions—teams use it to simulate interaction detail that feels closer to real behavior. It can complement UI design tools by focusing on the interactive layer.

• Typical match: richer interaction testing and user testing preparation.
• Workflow note: it can be paired with a design-system tool when teams split UI creation and interaction simulation.

Published numbers: ProtoPie lists a Free plan with 5 prototypes and 5GB storage, and a Pro plan at $25/month (billed monthly) plus a Team plan at $49/month. [Source-9✅]

Framer is commonly considered when teams want prototypes that can extend toward web delivery and more realistic motion/interaction behavior. In an XD-replacement context, it often enters the conversation where “prototype” and “publish” start to overlap.

• Typical match: interactive experiences, marketing/product pages, and prototypes with a publication path.
• Decision lens: quota-based plans (pages, visitors, bandwidth) can matter as much as design features.

Published numbers: Framer’s Free plan is listed with 100 pages, 10k visitors/month, and 1,000MB bandwidth, while a Basic plan is listed at $5/month (billed yearly) with higher quotas. [Source-10✅]

Lunacy is often evaluated as an XD alternative when a desktop-first workflow is important and teams still want optional cloud documents and shared access. It can be a practical fit for teams that prefer installed tools across mixed operating systems.

• Platform coverage: the pricing page positions Lunacy as a desktop tool for Windows, Mac, and Linux.
• Operational detail: cloud docs and version history limits can influence team workflows.

Published numbers: Lunacy lists a Pro tier at $14.99 per user/month (billed monthly), plus a cloud document limit of 10 and version history of 30 versions per cloud doc; it also states servers are placed across 5 continents. [Source-11✅]

Marvel is often chosen by teams that want an approachable path from prototype to testing and handoff, with clear distinctions between team roles. In an XD-alternative shortlist, it typically appears when teams value simplicity and shareable flows.

• Role model: Marvel describes Team Members (paid) versus Contributors (included with a plan) for collaboration.
• Eligibility detail: pricing notes include education and non-profit discount programs.

Published numbers: Marvel states 70% off yearly plans for students and teachers and 50% off yearly plans for registered non-profits; it also states the free plan has no time-limits. [Source-12✅]